Blog Post

Pay-Per-Channel Television Service

Monday, September 24, 2007. 12:57 pm. Posted by Josh.

After recycling yet another of the countless mass marketing mailings I get from the local cable company (Mediacom), I reaffirmed to myself why I don't have cable television. In my area of the world, the basic cable television costs about $40+ per month. To me, it's outrageous to pay this amount of money just to watch TV. Especially when you are paying for 5 channels that you'll watch and 70 channels that you'll just flip through. The same can be said for the dish companies although their plans are at least cheaper than our local cable.

For many people like me, the majority of the shows that are watched are on a handful of channels. For me, it's mostly the major networks. I currently get over the air reception which usually works pretty darn well depending on the station. But there are times when it would be nice to have a clearer picture. And I have also thought about how it would be nice to have a few of the cable channels (Discovery for example). But I can't bring myself to pay $40 per month compared to my current $0 per month for these small upgrades.

What I think would be ideal, is if the cable or dish companies could figure out a way to provide a-la-carte channel purchases. Basically you'd pay a monthly service fee and then you'd pay a fee for whatever channels you wanted. Some channels would be more expensive than others I'm sure. But I could then buy cable service for CBC, ABC, NBC, PBS, and Discovery. A 5 channel cable bill would have to be cheaper than the full 75 channels.

Just think of the new found sense of ownership the consumers would have if they could choose exactly what they wanted to buy. I think they'd be able to gain quite a few customers that would otherwise never think of getting "basic" cable.

And as an added benefit, maybe we'd completely eradicate some of those little-watched cable channels that are just taking up bandwidth.

Posted in: Business , Gripes , Ideas
This article has been viewed 496 times.
Comments: 3

Comments

Post Comment

Monday, September 24, 2007. 2:52 pm. Posted by zbreits.

Sounds like a good idea, but no way would the cable company ever go for it. I think when you get cable, all the chanels come in together, so if you wanted to only buy 5 chanels, they would have to filter out the rest (more work for them wouldnt make a lower price for you) Plus, i am thinking that the cable companies probably have contracts with all the channels to keep them in the bundle, so that crappy channels like BET and lifetime dont get ripped off. However, this might be a possibility with satelite.
In any case, I'll stick to rabbit ears for as long as i can, ecspecially since living in dallas, i can get like 15 channels (but half are in spainish).
BTW, does any one know how long i can go with rabbit ears? will the change to HD ruin that?

Monday, September 24, 2007. 5:49 pm. Posted by Josh.

I agree, I doubt that it will ever come to this, but it would be ideal. As far as your question about the over-the-air (OTA) transmissions, I can answer that, and hopefully won't get too "techy".

In Februrary 2009 (I believe is the cutoff), the FCC has mandated that all television stations cease transmitting their current signal. At that point, they will only be allowed to transmit a digital signal. Many of these signals will be high definition (HD) and some will be standard, or enhanced definition (SD, ED), but all will be digital.

Likewise, the spectrum that is currently used for VHF transmissions (currently the lower numbered channels 2-13 I think) will be abandoned and auctioned off to bidders for other uses. Digital television will all be transmitted in the UHF spectrum. Most antennas these days (rabbit ears or big attic antennas) have both a VHF and UHF capability. UHF currently is all our high-number channels (14-62 I think). On rabbit ears, the UHF antenna will often be in the shape of a loop.

So, a UHF antenna will be required to pick up the digital (SD,ED,HD) signals starting in 2009. Most antennas already handle it. If you go to stores like BestBuy, you'll see HD Antennas. All this is is a UHF-only antenna. Nothing special about it other than marketing.

The thing that will cause you more pain is that, unless you already have a brand new TV, your TV will not be able to handle the digital signal. You'll either have to upgrade TVs to one that has a digital tuner in it, or purchase a converter box (sometimes called an HD set top box). The box would work like a cable or dish box, but for your OTA transmissions. I believe the government is making available $40 vouchers (2 per household) that you could use toward the purchase of converter boxes.

Also remember that if you keep your standard TV, you won't be getting the most out of the HD signal. The set top box will basically downgrade the signal to work on your TV. You might get a little more clarity from the digital signal, but you won't get HD without an HDTV.

Hope that answers your question.

Monday, September 24, 2007. 7:06 pm. Posted by zbreits.

That answeres it very well.

thanks;)

BreitTechnologies
Pantoozle
Art
Blog News
Books
Building Our House
Business
Compact Fluorescent
Downloads
Economics
Energy Efficiency
Finance
Gas and Oil
Global Warming
Gripes
Guides
Human Behavior
Ideas
Lawn Care
Misc
Movies
Photography
Planting A New Lawn
Politics
Reviews
Science
Space
Sports
Taxes
The Environment
Tips
Web Picks
Yay!
March 2011 (1)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (1)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (1)
May 2009 (1)
April 2009 (1)
March 2009 (2)
February 2009 (4)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (1)
November 2008 (2)
October 2008 (3)
September 2008 (3)
August 2008 (2)
July 2008 (2)
June 2008 (5)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (4)
March 2008 (1)
February 2008 (6)
December 2007 (3)
November 2007 (5)
October 2007 (4)
September 2007 (8)
August 2007 (11)
July 2007 (13)
June 2007 (15)
May 2007 (24)
April 2007 (4)
RSS Feed Link
Add to Technorati Favorites